Law Offices of Scott D. Hughes
Call Today! 714.987.2671
  • Home
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Areas of Practice
  • Legal Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
Legal Blog 2015 October New California Law Penal Code Section 1016.3
Previous Post  |  Next Post

New California Law Penal Code Section 1016.3

Posted By Scott Hughes || 22-Oct-2015

The new California law Penal Code Section 1016.3 was signed by Gov. Brown imposing additional duties on California Criminal Defense Lawyers .

In Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), the United States Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires defense counsel to provide affirmative and competent advice to noncitizen defendants regarding the potential immigration consequences of their criminal cases. California courts also have held that defense counsel must investigate and advise regarding the immigration consequences of the available dispositions, and should, when consistent with the goals of and informed consent of the defendant, and as consistent with professional standards, defend against adverse immigration consequences (People v. Soriano, 194 Cal.App.3d 1470 (1987), People v. Barocio, 216 Cal.App.3d 99 (1989), People v. Bautista, 115 Cal.App.4th 229 (2004)).

Defendants who are misadvised or not advised at all of the immigration consequences of criminal charges often suffer irreparable damage to their current or potential lawful immigration status, resulting in penalties such as mandatory detention, deportation, and permanent separation from close family. In some cases, these consequences could have been avoided had counsel provided informed advice and attempted to defend against such consequences.

The immigration consequences of criminal convictions have a particularly strong impact in California. One out of every four persons living in the state is foreign-born. One out of every two children lives in a household headed by at least one foreign-born person. The majority of these children are United States citizens. It is estimated that 50,000 parents of California United States citizen children were deported in a little over two years. Once a person is deported, especially after a criminal conviction, it is extremely unlikely that he or she ever is permitted to return.

It was the intent of the Legislature to codify Padilla v. Kentucky and related California case law and to encourage the growth of additional case law in furtherance of justice.

Penal Code Section 1016.3

(a) Defense counsel shall provide accurate and affirmative advice about the immigration consequences of a proposed disposition, and when consistent with the goals of and with the informed consent of the defendant, and consistent with professional standards, defend against those consequences.

(b) The prosecution, in the interests of justice, and in furtherance of the findings and declarations of Section 1016.2, shall consider the avoidance of adverse immigration consequences in the plea negotiation process as one factor in an effort to reach a just resolution.

(c) This code section shall not be interpreted to change the requirements of Section 1016.5, including the requirement that no defendant shall be required to disclose his or her immigration status to the court.

Scott D. Hughes is a California Criminal Defense Lawyer practicing in State and Federal Court.

Categories: Criminal Defense, Immigration Law

Share Post

Contact The Law Offices of Scott D. Hughes

We Will Review Your Case For Free

Request A Free Consultation
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us
Law Offices of Scott D. Hughes

Call Today (714) 987-2671

Law Offices of Scott D. Hughes - Orange County Attorney
620 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 View Map
Toll-Free (714) 987-2671
Website: http://www.scotthugheslaw.com/
© 2023 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.